Abstract
Public firms have wide latitude to release descriptive research and development (R&D) information. Conceptually, a higher descriptive R&D intensity (DRDI) enables a more thorough assessment of a firm’s prospects and reduces information asymmetry. However, such disclosure may undermine the firm’s future competitive advantages by allowing competitors to observe the firm’s R&D efforts more closely. By analyzing the textual content of 23,269 annual reports and leveraging the staggered statewide rejection of the inevitable disclosure doctrine as our instrumental variable for DRDI, we find that DRDI positively affects firm value. We also find that the presence of Chief Innovation Officer and intangible know-how positively, while financial leverage and market turbulence negatively, moderate the effect of DRDI on firm value. Notably, although both DRDI and numerical R&D intensity (NRDI) deliver potentially valuable information about R&D activities, DRDI is distinct from and has a more significant explanatory power of firm value than NRDI.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
