Abstract
This study examines the value relevance of bank cash holdings information and the moderating effect of board outside multiple directorships on such relevance. Our sample is based on a dual-banking system (i.e., conventional and Islamic banks) which represents 70 listed banks for the period from 2010 to 2018. On average, our analysis indicates that investors negatively value banks’ holdings of large free cash flow. However, having busy board outside members, who are able to monitor that free cash reserves more effectively, tends to enhance the public confidence and in turn, cancel out the negative value relevance of cash holding information. Moreover, the predicted reputational benefits of appointing busy directors are not prevalent in the context of Islamic banking, which requires stricter monitoring by boards due to the complex business model adopted, distinctive systems of governance, and higher agency conflicts when compared to conventional banking.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
