Abstract
:Background:The research was done to evaluate the value of the visual evoked potentials test in the assessment of visual pathways function in cases with head trauma and minimal findings on routine testing.Methods:A prospective case series evaluating use of visual evoked potentials testing in patients with a history of head trauma and suffering from visual symptoms with no significant clinical and neuroimaging findings, referred for further work up.Results:Thirty-four patients with a history of head trauma and subsequent visual complaints were included. 27 cases (79.4%) were male and 7 cases (20.6%) were female. The mean elapsed time after the trauma was 47.6 weeks (range: 3.5 to 320 weeks). Twenty-five cases had unilateral and 9 cases had bilateral visual complaints. History of coma with mean duration of 12 days was present in 4 cases. The best-corrected visual acuity was less than 1 Log MAR (legally blind) in 21 eyes. In 4 eyes (12%) the relative afferent papillary defect test was positive. Mild to moderate optic disc pallor was present bilaterally in 4 cases and unilaterally in 3 cases. Hemorrhagic patches were reported on MRI in 2 cases; no other cases had pathologic MRI findings. In unilateral cases, there was a statistically significant difference between the involved eye-sided lobe and the sound eye-sided lobe implicit time and amplitude. In patients with bilateral complaints, by testing each eye, the VEP amplitudes of both eyes showed significant differences with the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards, whereas the implicit times showed not-statistically significant differences.Conclusions:The visual evoked potentials test shows not only additional diagnostic value, not seen on routine clinical and neuroimaging testing, but also rather a high validity in tracing visual disability in traumatic brain injury.
Highlights
S igns and symptoms of visual disturbances, which may appear early or late after the trauma, could present a diagnostic challenge for clinicians
These considerations made many experts to think about other methods to evaluate the visual pathways in brain traumas, especially those objective and functional tests such as visual evoked potentials (VEP) which measures the light stimulus responses as electrical signals over the occipital lobe scalp. This test could be performed in uncooperative patients like children and cases in especial physical condition. In agreement with these works, we studied the VEP changes in 34 patients with post head trauma visual complaints and unreasonable clinical and neuroimaging findings
From January to December 2018, patients with visual complaints after head trauma, who were referred to the electrodiagnostic clinic of the Farabi eye hospital, were included in this case series
Summary
S igns and symptoms of visual disturbances, which may appear early or late after the trauma, could present a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. Van Stavern et al reported a study on 326 consecutive patients with head trauma, mostly due to motor vehicle accidents.[1] They found abnormal neuro-ophthalmic findings in 56.7% of their cases,[1] and reported that both afferent and efferent pathways are vulnerable to. Materials and Methods: A prospective case series evaluating use of visual evoked potentials testing in patients with a history of head trauma and suffering from visual symptoms with no significant clinical and neuroimaging findings, referred for further work up. Twenty-five cases had unilateral and 9 cases had bilateral visual complaints. In patients with bilateral complaints, by testing each eye, the VEP amplitudes of both eyes showed significant differences with the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards, whereas the implicit times showed not-statistically significant differences
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
