The Value of the Prostate Health Index and Derived Indexes in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with PI-RADS-3 Lesions

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the diagnostic value of prostate health index (PHI) and its derivatives in prostate cancer (PCa) with prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS)-3 lesions. Methods: Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (n = 155) were included in the BPH group, while all patients with PCa (n = 49) were enrolled in the PCa group. Between the groups, the serum concentrations of total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA), percent-free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA), prostate health index (PHI), prostate health index density (PHID), and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were compared. Results: On average, 49 (24%) of 204 men had PCa on biopsy, with 81.63% of those cases being clinically serious. Age, prostate volume, TPSA, and PSAD did not significantly differ between the PCa group and the BPH group. In contrast, [-2]pro prostate-specific antigen (p2PSA) (17.10 ± 4.77 vs. 13.93 ± 3.22, p < 0.001), PHI (33.88 ± 8.81 vs. 25.83 ± 5.63, p < 0.001), and PHID (0.52 ± 0.15 vs. 0.38 ± 0.11, p < 0.001) showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Compared to conventional PSA, PHI (AUC = 0.786, 95% CI: 0.705–0.867) and PHID (AUC = 0.763, 95% CI: 0.684–0.843) were considerably better predictors of all PCa. The TPSA, %fPSA, p2PSA, PHI, PHID, and PSAD areas under the receiver operating characteristic for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were 0.587, 0.650, 0.696, 0.823, 0.796, and 0.614, respectively. Out of all the various parameters, PHI and PHID performed very well in this cohort’s biopsy outcome prediction. Conclusion: PHI offers the best diagnostic value for detecting PCa in cases of PI-RADS-3 lesions. Additionally, PHID raised the possibility of csPCa PI-RADS-3 lesions. However, more investigation is required to confirm our results by using multicenter collaboration.