Abstract
This paper captures the value of public participation as a redeemer of South African municipalities in land use planning. In this paper, it is argued that there is scant public participation in local government developmental matters, especially in land-use planning. South African municipalities are congested due to lack of public participation in land-use planning in the municipal arena. This is despite the fact that the constitution requires active public engagement in questions of developing local administration. The challenge of inactive public participation endures throughout the IDP, and this is now perceived as a dream wish. It is further argued that it is important to involve the public in land-use, especially in the following categories: commercial, residential, public facilities, industrial, and open spaces. The arguments in this paper were also founded on Patsy Healey's 1997 theory of collaborative planning. Collaborative planning theory has been used to develop ideas and arguments. This is a conceptual paper based on secondary data. The paper relied heavily on current literature on public participation and land-use planning. Despite the arrival of democracy in South Africa, the theoretical findings of this research indicated that there is still apartheid in spatial planning. It is also discovered that the adopted South African apartheid spatial planning continues to overlook community involvement in municipal land-use planning. When it comes to planning, the study proposes that municipal authorities follow the Batho Pele principles. At the municipal level, public engagement should not be passive but interactive and consultative. Finally, the paper advocates for land-use planning reforms and the use of active public engagement to save South African municipalities from congestion.
Highlights
Background and IntroductionThe democratic dispensation in South Africa did not suggest that the government had achieved almost everything
Nel (2016) argues that Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act (SPLUMA) is unequivocally regulating as it underscores change, social equity, value and consideration, public participation, and straightforward decision making are at the centre of the legislation
As much as community participation is imperative, this paper was discussed in the context of South Africa by looking at the legal imperatives that encourage public participation in developmental local government
Summary
Background and IntroductionThe democratic dispensation in South Africa did not suggest that the government had achieved almost everything. In the advent of democracy like that of South Africa, the involvement of communities and public participation essentially play a role in confirming that the directives of the developmental local government are satisfied (Maimela and Mathebula, 2015). They lament that permitting the community to actively participate in decision-making and the Integrated Development Planning (IDP) process of a municipality will in turn provide benefits to the municipality concerned (Maimela and Mathebula, 2015). This paper interrogates the values of public participation in land-use planning
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
