Abstract
Introduction: Stress echocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method of evaluating the patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the risk factors of an adverse cardiovascular event after a normal exercise (ESE) or dobutamine (DSE) stress echocardiography are not well established. Methods: A cohort of 705 patients without previous history of CAD and a negative ESE/DSE was studied. All studies were performed in a high-volume echocardiologic laboratory and interpreted by two experienced echocardiography-trained cardiologists. Patients with inconclusive studies and those with an evidence of myocardial ischemia were excluded. Demographic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic findings were recorded. Patients were followed for at least 2 years. Independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were determined by regression analysis. Results: During a period of 55.7±17.5 months, MACE occurred in 35 (5.0%) of patients. Negative predictive value (NPV) of DSE was 89.2%, which was significantly less than 96.5% for ESE in predicting the occurrence of MACE (P = 0.001). MACE occurred more frequently among older (≥65 years) men with preexisting diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. During ESE, a higher maximum blood pressure*heart rate product for the achieved level of metabolic equivalent (METS) of tasks was also an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusion: Inability of patients to undergo traditional ESE that led to the choice of using DSE alternative reduces the NPV of the stress echocardiography among patients without previous history of CAD. A modest rise of heart rate and blood pressure in response to increased level of activity serves as favorable prognostic value and improves the NPV of stress echocardiography.
Highlights
Stress echocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method of evaluating the patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD)
Even though stress echocardiography has a high negative predictive value (NPV),[7] the factors that predict a worse outcome in the setting of a normal study are not well-defined
According to the findings of this study, in patients with a normal ESE/DSE, the event-free survival was shorter in men within the age group of ≥65-year-old who were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia
Summary
Stress echocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method of evaluating the patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The risk factors of an adverse cardiovascular event after a normal exercise (ESE) or dobutamine (DSE) stress echocardiography are not well established. Methods: A cohort of 705 patients without previous history of CAD and a negative ESE/DSE was studied. Even though stress echocardiography has a high negative predictive value (NPV),[7] the factors that predict a worse outcome in the setting of a normal study are not well-defined. Left ventricular dysfunction and higher peak wall motion score index during stress echocardiography can be indicative of less favorable prognosis.[9-11] Though, these factors make the test positive and do not apply to patients with a normal study. We followed up all patients with no history of CAD who had a normal exercise (ESE) or dobutamine (DSE) stress echocardiography for at least 2 years.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.