Abstract

Introduction: Stress echocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method of evaluating the patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the risk factors of an adverse cardiovascular event after a normal exercise (ESE) or dobutamine (DSE) stress echocardiography are not well established. Methods: A cohort of 705 patients without previous history of CAD and a negative ESE/DSE was studied. All studies were performed in a high-volume echocardiologic laboratory and interpreted by two experienced echocardiography-trained cardiologists. Patients with inconclusive studies and those with an evidence of myocardial ischemia were excluded. Demographic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic findings were recorded. Patients were followed for at least 2 years. Independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were determined by regression analysis. Results: During a period of 55.7±17.5 months, MACE occurred in 35 (5.0%) of patients. Negative predictive value (NPV) of DSE was 89.2%, which was significantly less than 96.5% for ESE in predicting the occurrence of MACE (P = 0.001). MACE occurred more frequently among older (≥65 years) men with preexisting diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. During ESE, a higher maximum blood pressure*heart rate product for the achieved level of metabolic equivalent (METS) of tasks was also an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusion: Inability of patients to undergo traditional ESE that led to the choice of using DSE alternative reduces the NPV of the stress echocardiography among patients without previous history of CAD. A modest rise of heart rate and blood pressure in response to increased level of activity serves as favorable prognostic value and improves the NPV of stress echocardiography.

Highlights

  • Stress echocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method of evaluating the patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD)

  • Even though stress echocardiography has a high negative predictive value (NPV),[7] the factors that predict a worse outcome in the setting of a normal study are not well-defined

  • According to the findings of this study, in patients with a normal ESE/DSE, the event-free survival was shorter in men within the age group of ≥65-year-old who were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stress echocardiography is a safe and cost-effective method of evaluating the patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The risk factors of an adverse cardiovascular event after a normal exercise (ESE) or dobutamine (DSE) stress echocardiography are not well established. Methods: A cohort of 705 patients without previous history of CAD and a negative ESE/DSE was studied. Even though stress echocardiography has a high negative predictive value (NPV),[7] the factors that predict a worse outcome in the setting of a normal study are not well-defined. Left ventricular dysfunction and higher peak wall motion score index during stress echocardiography can be indicative of less favorable prognosis.[9-11] Though, these factors make the test positive and do not apply to patients with a normal study. We followed up all patients with no history of CAD who had a normal exercise (ESE) or dobutamine (DSE) stress echocardiography for at least 2 years.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.