Abstract

Background and Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have become essential tools for prostate cancer evaluation. We evaluated the ability of PI-RADS scores in identifying significant prostate cancer, which would help avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≤ 20 ng/mL, who underwent prostate MRI for evaluation from January 2018 to November 2019, were analyzed. Among them, 105 patients who received transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy were included. PSA, PI-RADS scores (low 1–2, high 3–5), biopsy results, and Gleason scores (GS) were evaluated. Biopsies with GS higher than 3 + 4 were considered as significant cancers and biopsies with no cancer or Gleason 3 + 3 were considered insignificant or no cancers. Results: Among the 105 patients, 45 patients had low PI-RADS and 60 had high PI-RADS scores. There were no patients with significant prostate cancer in the low PI-RADS groups. For the high PI-RADS group, 28 (46.7%) patients had significant cancer and 32 (53.3%) had insignificant or no cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of high PI-RADS to detect significant cancer was 100% and 58.4%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 46.7% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusions: Low PI-RADS scores on MRI did not show significant prostate cancer and surveillance should be considered in selected cases to prevent unnecessary invasive procedures and overdiagnosis.

Highlights

  • Screening for prostate cancer is a controversial topic [1]

  • A total of 105 patients who underwent prostate Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy were included in this study

  • Futterer et al reviewed the available literature on the ability of Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to detect clinically significant prostate cancer and showed that the negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) for the detection of significant cancer was 63% to 98% and 34% to 68%, respectively [13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Screening for prostate cancer is a controversial topic [1]. Appropriately timed diagnosis is essential for optimal treatment and management of any disease. Standard transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy can cause severe post-procedure complications which may prolong hospitalization and treatment duration [4]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool for prostate cancer evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the Prostate ImagingReporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have become essential tools for prostate cancer evaluation. We evaluated the ability of PI-RADS scores in identifying significant prostate cancer, which would help avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. PSA, PI-RADS scores (low 1–2, high 3–5), biopsy results, and Gleason scores (GS) were evaluated. There were no patients with significant prostate cancer in the low PI-RADS groups. Conclusions: Low PI-RADS scores on MRI did not show significant prostate cancer and surveillance should be considered in selected cases to prevent unnecessary invasive procedures and overdiagnosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call