Abstract

The value of Lateral Flow urine Lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) assay and the role of empiric tuberculosis (TB) treatment in the era of the highly sensitive Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) assay is unclear. This study aimed to assess the additional yield of LF-LAM assay when used in combination with Xpert Ultra, and the role of empiric TB treatment when Xpert Ultra used as the initial diagnostic in presumptive TB cases admitted to a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of hospitalized Xpert MTB/RIF-negative patients. Sputum samples were examined for Mycobacterium tuberculosis by culture and Xpert Ultra. In HIV positive and severely ill patients, a urine sample was collected for the LF-LAM assay. Treatment outcome was assessed six months after enrollment. Logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of deaths among Xpert Ultra negative patients. The Xpert Ultra assay diagnosed 31 of the 35 culture positive among the 250 hospitalized Xpert MTB/RIF-negative participants. The LF-LAM assay did not identify any case not detected by Xpert Ultra among the 52 (21.4%) participants living with HIV and the 16 patients with severe disease. Among Xpert Ultra negative patients, those who received empirical TB treatment had a similar odds of death (aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.1–2.7) as those not started on TB treatment. Low body mass index (≤ 18.5 kg/m2) was the only significant predictor of death in Xpert Ultra negative patients (aOR 4. 0, 95% CI: 1.08–14.6). In this prospective cohort, LF-LAM did not improve the diagnostic yield when used in combination with Xpert Ultra. Empiric TB treatment for Xpert Ultra negative presumptive TB cases was not associated with death at six months. Future studies in diverse settings should be to determine the optimal management of Xpert Ultra negative patients.

Highlights

  • Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) c­ omplex[1]

  • In smear-negative TB cases, Xpert Ultra was 17% more sensitive compared to Xpert MTB/ RIF; in people living with HIV Xpert Ultra was 13% more ­sensitive[11,12,13]

  • In this prospective cohort study, we confirmed the high sensitivity of Xpert Ultra among cases of presumptive TB, as 89% (31 of the 35) of the culture positive cases missed by Xpert MTB/RIF were positive on Xpert Ultra

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) c­ omplex[1]. The use of empirical treatment can be justified in these settings given the suboptimal performance of the Xpert assay, especially among smear negative individuals (sensitivity of 67%) and in people living with HIV (sensitivity of 80%)[7,8]. In smear-negative TB cases, Xpert Ultra was 17% more sensitive compared to Xpert MTB/ RIF; in people living with HIV Xpert Ultra was 13% more ­sensitive[11,12,13]. We aimed to assess the additional yield of LF-LAM assay when used in combination with Xpert Ultra, and the role of empiric TB treatment in Xpert Ultra negative patients with symptoms of TB admitted to a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call