Abstract

Hybrid aspen is one of the most promising tree species for short-rotation forestry in Northern Europe. After the clearcutting of hybrid aspen plantation, the next generation arises from root and stump sprouts. The economic feasibility of different management strategies of hybrid aspen coppice stands has not yet been comprehensively evaluated in Northern Europe. We compared the land expectation values (LEVs) of hybrid aspen coppice stands managed according to four scenarios: three early thinning methods (corridor, cross-corridor and single-tree) followed by conventional management and intensive bioenergy production (repeated harvests in 5-year rotations) over a 25-year period in hemiboreal Estonia. We considered the historic price volatility of aspen wood assortments under various discount rates (1–20%). We found that the 25-year rotation with different early thinning methods was more profitable than short bioenergy cycles in the case of low discount rates (<5%). The LEV of short coppice cycles for only bioenergy production became more profitable in comparison with those by thinning methods, when higher discount rates (>10%) were applied. Hybrid aspen coppice stands can be managed profitably, but more risks are taken when the management strategy focuses only on bioenergy production.

Highlights

  • The European Union has set a strategy to become climate-neutral by 2050, but at the same time maintaining the competitiveness of the economy [1]

  • 25-year rotation3c) period, whereas slight precommercial thinning would be needed in the rotation period, whereas a slight precommercial thinning would be needed in the corridor thinning scenario

  • While the expected rate of return as an endogenous factor affecting the land expectation values (LEVs) is known for an investor, it can vary in time, the exogenous factor of price dynamics cannot be altered by an investor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The European Union has set a strategy to become climate-neutral by 2050, but at the same time maintaining the competitiveness of the economy [1]. Such an ambitious goal can be achieved under the sustainable bioeconomy development [2], where the usage of renewable energy sources must be significantly increased in comparison with the current level [3]. Forests and woody biomass play an important role in those strategies by substituting fossil fuels as well as absorbing the atmospheric CO2 [4]. In Nordic and Baltic countries, considerable effort to substitute fossil fuels with bioenergy has been made, and future projections foresee increasing usage of wood-based biofuels [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call