Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of single photon emission computed tomography and/or computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in differentiating metastatic from benign solitary skull lesions. Consecutive patients who had a SPECT/CT of the head subsequent to a whole-body bone scan (WBS) for the evaluation of a single skull lesion were selected. A single skull lesion on the WBS was further evaluated with SPECT/CT to characterize the lesion. The results of the SPECT/CT were correlated with other radiologic examinations performed within 2 weeks. An average follow-up interval after the SPECT/CT was 8.9 months to correlate with additional radiologic imaging studies and clinical information. A total of 19 lesions in 19 patients were seen on the WBS and 2 additional lesions on the SPECT/CT. All lesions demonstrated focal increased tracer uptake. The SPECT/CT correctly identified 3 out of 3 metastatic lesions and 12 out of 17 benign lesions, that is 71% of lesions were correctly classifised as metastatic or benign lesions. Only 1 patient was classified incorrectly as metastatic lesion with SPECT/CT when it was proven benign by other imaging modalities and follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of SPECT/CT images in identifying metastatic lesions were 100%, 92%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. Five lesions remained indeterminate even after the SPECT/CT interpretation and were confirmed benign by other imaging modalities. SPECT/CT can help identify benign versus metastatic solitary skull lesions in most of the patients with high sensitivity and specificity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.