Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores the relationship between perceived quality as indicated by the front of package (FOP) and point of purchase (POP) summaries, objective quality, price, and value among 270 cold cereals. Findings reveal organic and whole-grain summaries are associated with higher objective quality; however, organic cereals offer lower value as these cereals are overpriced. Wholegrain-certified cereals are priced more affordably and offer better value. Cereals marked as “heart-healthy” at the point of purchase have better objective quality and lower price and better value. Cereals with POP and FOP gluten-free claims are associated with lower value; low objective quality and a higher price. Cereals with the gluten-free certification were found to offer the lowest value among all summary categroies. Kids’ cereals were of lower objective quality, the same price, and lower value, compared to other targets. Implications for consumer, cereal manufacturers and public policy are discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.