The value of coronary computed tomography and very early invasive coronary angiography compared to standard intervention in older patients after non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Abstract

Abstract Background The optimal management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) remains a challenge. The merits of both computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a rule-out test for significant coronary artery disease and early invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are debated. Furthermore, there are limited data in older NSTEACS patients, who likely have more coronary artery calcification and are at higher risk of ACS-related complications. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of patients ≥75 years included in the Very Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Trial (VERDICT). The diagnostic accuracy of CTA was investigated in patients without previous coronary artery bypass grafting, renal dysfunction, or atrial fibrillation; the presence of a coronary artery stenosis ≥50% determined by ICA was used as reference. Patients were randomised to very early ICA within 12 hours of diagnosis or standard care (ICA within 48–72 hours of diagnosis) and followed for up to five years. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal recurrent MI, hospital admission for refractory myocardial ischaemia or hospital admission for heart failure. Results From November 2010 to June 2016, 2147 patients were included in the VERDICT trial. Of these, 452 (21%) patients were ≥75 years of age. Most older patients had a GRACE score >140 (n=388, 88.8%). At the time of admission, older patients had lower levels of haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction, and more often displayed elevated troponins and electrocardiogram changes indicating new ischaemia, than those <75 years. Of patients ≥75 years of age, 161 (35.6%) underwent CTA before ICA. Older patients had significantly higher calcium scores than younger patients (1187±1445 vs. 499±858 Agatston units, p<0.001). 19% of CTAs excluded significant coronary artery disease. The negative predictive value of the CTAs was 94 (95% CI 79–99)% and the sensitivity was 98 (95% CI 94–100)%, figure 1. The primary endpoint was observed more frequently in patients ≥75 years as compared to younger patients (n=222, 49% vs. n=390, 23%, p<0.001), even after adjustment for allocated treatment (adjusted HR 2.65, 95% CI 2.25–3.13, p<0.001). Among older patients randomised to very early ICA, there were no differences in the cumulated number of primary endpoints compared to older patients randomised to standard ICA (log-rank p=0.36), figure 2. Conclusion Among patients ≥75 years old with NSTEACS, CTA showed a high diagnostic accuracy. A very early ICA within 12 hours of diagnosis did not improve long-term composite outcome in these older patients with NSTEACS. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Rigshospitalets Research Foundation