Abstract
Connectivity is a central concept in ecology, wildlife management, and conservation science. Understanding the role of connectivity in determining species persistence is increasingly important in the face of escalating anthropogenic impacts on climate and habitat. These connectivity augmenting processes can severely impact species distributions and community and ecosystem functioning.One general definition of connectivity is that it is an emergent process arising from a set of spatial interdependencies between individuals or populations, and increasingly realistic representations of connectivity are being sought. Generally, connectivity consists of a structural component, relating to the distribution of suitable and unsuitable habitat, and a functional component, relating to movement behavior, yet the interaction of both components often better describes ecological processes. Additionally, although implied by ‘movement', demographic measures such as the occurrence or abundance of organisms are regularly overlooked when quantifying connectivity. Integrating such demographic contributions based on the knowledge of species distribution patterns is critical to understanding the dynamics of spatially structured populations.Demographically‐informed connectivity draws from fundamental concepts in metapopulation ecology while maintaining important conceptual developments from landscape ecology, and the methodological development of spatially‐explicit hierarchical statistical models that have the potential to overcome modeling and data challenges. Together, this offers a promising framework for developing ecologically realistic connectivity metrics.This review synthesizes existing approaches for quantifying connectivity and advocates for demographically‐informed connectivity as a general framework for addressing current problems across ecological fields reliant on connectivity‐driven processes such as population ecology, conservation biology and landscape ecology. Using supporting simulations to highlight the consequences of commonly made assumptions that overlook important demographic contributions, we show that even small amounts of demographic information can greatly improve model performance. Ultimately, we argue demographic measures are central to extending the concept of connectivity and resolves long‐standing challenges associated with accurately quantifying the influence of connectivity on fundamental ecological processes.
Highlights
The ability to accurately measure connectivity is crucial for managing habitat loss and fragmentation (Rayfield et al 2011, Wasserman et al 2012, Haddad et al 2015, 2016) in order to preserve genetic diversity and promote population persistence (Hilty et al 2020)
Population dynamics (Clinchy et al 2002), disease networks (Margosian et al 2009), forestry planning (Banks et al 2005), wildlife management (Horváth et al 2019), conservation reserve design (Blowes and Connolly 2012, Gupta et al 2019), spatial conservation planning (Daigle et al 2020), invasive species mitigation (Drake et al 2017a), landscape genetics (Marrotte et al 2017) and more, all invoke the concept of connectivity, but often in different contexts and spatiotemporal scales
Influence of demography for parameter recovery Here we focus on the ability to recover the parameter α, the spatial scale parameter of the dispersal kernel that represents the spatial scale of connectivity
Summary
Subject Editor: Robert Fletcher Editor-in-Chief: Robert D. Implied by ‘movement’, demographic measures such as the occurrence or abundance of organisms are regularly overlooked when quantifying connectivity Integrating such demographic contributions based on the knowledge of species distribution patterns is critical to understanding the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Demographically-informed connectivity draws from fundamental concepts in metapopulation ecology while maintaining important conceptual developments from landscape ecology, and the methodological development of spatially-explicit hierarchical statistical models that have the potential to overcome modeling and data challenges. Together, this offers a promising framework for developing ecologically realistic connectivity metrics.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
