Abstract
Abstract. Citizen observatories are a relatively recent form of citizen science. As part of the flood risk management strategy of the Brenta-Bacchiglione catchment, a citizen observatory for flood risk management has been proposed and is currently being implemented. Citizens are involved through monitoring water levels and obstructions and providing other relevant information through mobile apps, where the data are assimilated with other sensor data in a hydrological–hydraulic model used in early warning. A cost–benefit analysis of the citizen observatory was undertaken to demonstrate the value of this approach in monetary terms. Although not yet fully operational, the citizen observatory is assumed to decrease the social vulnerability of the flood risk. By calculating the hazard, exposure and vulnerability of three flood scenarios (required for flood risk management planning by the EU Directive on Flood Risk Management) with and without the proposed citizen observatory, it is possible to evaluate the benefits in terms of the average annual avoided damage costs. Although currently a hypothetical exercise, the results showed a reduction in avoided damage of 45 % compared to a business as usual scenario. Thus, linking citizen science and citizen observatories with hydrological modelling to raise awareness of flood hazards and to facilitate two-way communication between citizens and local authorities has great potential in reducing future flood risk in the Brenta-Bacchiglione catchment. Moreover, such approaches are easily transferable to other catchments.
Highlights
In 2018, flooding affected the highest number of people of any natural disaster globally and caused major damage worldwide (CRED, 2019)
The assessment of flood risk involves quantifying three main drivers (National Research Council, 2015): (a) flood hazard, which is the probability that a flood of a certain magnitude will occur in a certain period of time in a given area; (b) exposure, which is the economic value of the human lives and assets affected by the flood hazard; and (c) vulnerability, which is the degree to which different elements will suffer damage associated with the flood hazard
There is currently a lack of available, appropriate and peerreviewed evaluation methods and evidence on the added value of citizen observatories, which is required before they will be more widely adopted by policymakers and practitioners
Summary
In 2018, flooding affected the highest number of people of any natural disaster globally and caused major damage worldwide (CRED, 2019). The frequency and magnitude of extreme events will increase, leading to a higher risk of flooding (Schiermeier, 2011). This risk will be further exacerbated by future economic and population growth (Tanoue et al, 2016). The assessment of flood risk involves quantifying three main drivers (National Research Council, 2015): (a) flood hazard, which is the probability that a flood of a certain magnitude will occur in a certain period of time in a given area; (b) exposure, which is the economic value of the human lives and assets affected by the flood hazard; and (c) vulnerability, which is the degree to which different elements (i.e. people, buildings, infrastructure, economic activities, etc.) will suffer damage associated with the flood hazard. Flood risk can be mitigated through hard engineering strategies such as the implementation of structural flood protection schemes, soft engineering approaches comprising more natural methods of flood management (Levy and Hall, 2005) and community-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have