Abstract

Methods All patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-like presentation of myocarditis, with confirmed diagnosis at baseline according to standard CMR criteria and follow-up examination available, were retrospectively identified in our database. CMR images were analyzed to determine left ventricular (LV) dimensions, LV mass and total amount of late gadolinium enhancement. LGE was quantified using signal intensity >5 SD above normal myocardium and was expressed as percentage of LV mass. Improvement of LV function (LVF) was defined as in increase in ejection fraction (EF) of ≥5%. Results Fifteen consecutive patients were included in the present study. Follow-up CMR was performed at a mean of 282 ± 187 days after admission. At baseline, mean EF was 51 ± 7% and was impaired in 11 patients (47 ± 4 %). EF improved in 8 of these 11 patients (73%). Total indexed myocardial mass (TMM) and the extent of LGE at baseline did not differ between patients that improved and those that did not (52.9 ± 12.4 vs. 56.9 ± 21.2, p = 0.697; 8.2 ± 6.3 vs. 9.2 ± 6.8, p = 0.821). At follow-up, the extent of LGE decreased in patients with and patients without LV improvement (-3.0±5.0 vs. -5.0±4.9, p=0.570). However, TMM decreased in patients that showed EF improvement, and not in patients without improvement (-10.8±7.9 vs. 1.9±4.1, p=0.029). Conclusions The majority of patients with an ACS-like presentation of myocarditis have a good prognosis. The improvement of LVF was accompanied by a decrease in myocardial mass. This decrease in myocardial mass likely reflects the resolution of acute inflammatory changes in acute myocarditis.

Highlights

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has good diagnostic performance in myocarditis, an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is still required when treatment against the underlying etiology is considered

  • All patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-like presentation of myocarditis, with confirmed diagnosis at baseline according to standard cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) criteria and follow-up examination available, were retrospectively identified in our database

  • Total indexed myocardial mass (TMM) and the extent of LGE at baseline did not differ between patients that improved and those that did not (52.9 ± 12.4 vs. 56.9 ± 21.2, p = 0.697; 8.2 ± 6.3 vs. 9.2 ± 6.8, p = 0.821)

Read more

Summary

Background

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has good diagnostic performance in myocarditis, an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is still required when treatment against the underlying etiology is considered. Many patients have a good prognosis following myocarditis and will not benefit from an EMB. The ability of CMR to predict outcomes in these patients may guide selective EMB

Methods
Results
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.