Abstract

Assessing the value of a power plant is an important issue for plant owners and prospective buyers. In a deregulated market, an owner has the option to operate the plant when the revenue from selling the electricity is higher than the cost of operating the plant. This option is known as the spark spread option. Under emission restrictions, when the carbon cost is deducted from the spark spread, the option is named as the clean spark spread option. This thesis presents an analysis on the spark spread and clean spark spread option based valuation methods for a power plant with multiple gas turbines having different input–output characteristics, emission rates, and capacities. Electricity, natural gas and carbon allowance prices are assumed to follow mean–reverting processes. Results demonstrate that CO2 allowance cost reduces the expected plant value, while the flexibility of switching among turbines adds value to the power plant. Weather also affects the power plant operation. This thesis also presents a valuation model for a power plant integrating spark spread and weather options. A cooler winter drawing more electricity could generate a higher payoff for the plant owner. A warmer winter, however, could lead to a lower payoff. An owner holding a long position in a temperature–based put option could exercise the option when the winter is milder. The exercise is triggered by the drop of heating degree days below a strike degree day. The number of weather contracts to buy is determined by minimizing the variance of the total payoff. Pricing of the weather option is calculated based on the mean–reverting behavior of temperature. Results demonstrate that the integrating weather option along with spark spread option adds value to the downward spark spread option based valuation of the plant in a warmer winter. A comparison of temperature modeling approaches with an aim to pricing weather option is also investigated. Regime–switching models generated from a combination of different underlying processes are utilized to determine the expected heating and cooling degree days. Weather option prices are then calculated based on a range of strike heating degree days.

Highlights

  • 1.1 The valuation of a power plantElectricity is an essential commodity in our daily life

  • One of the objectives of the research is to assess the value of a natural gas–fired power plant under carbon emission restrictions in order to observe the effect of the presence and absence of carbon allowance prices

  • Results demonstrate that the value of a power plant is reduced due to CO2 allowance cost, while operational flexibility of switching adds value to the power plant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 The valuation of a power plantElectricity is an essential commodity in our daily life. A natural gas–fired power plant burns natural gas to produce electricity and bears price risks from both purchasing natural gas and selling electricity. Deregulation, in many countries, restructured the monopolistic electricity market and has brought competition and price uncertainties for power plant owners. We present methods to assess the value of a natural gas–fired power plant with multiple turbine in presence and absence of carbon allowance price. A power plant can transfer its weather related uncertainties to a financial firm willing to absorb the risk. This risk is contingent on a predetermined underlying weather variable, for example, heating degree days (HDD) measured by summing up temperature degrees below a base temperature, for example, 18◦C. Three Markov regime–switching models are proposed and their performances are compared with that of a single–regime Ornstein–Uhlenbeck mean–reverting model

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call