The Validity of the Decision/Estimation of Pure Unstamped Duty Prodeo

Abstract

Pure prodeo is a method of litigation free of charge, or using no fees at all, meaning that the trial costs are given by justice seekers without any cost, including using stamp duty fees, so that decisions and decisions do not use stamp duty. In this case, there is the same meaning space, namely between practice in court which is generally required to use stamp duty, and pure fee which actually happens the other way around. the decision or decision of the court judge must be stamped, and the most important question is how the validity of the decision or determination of pure prodeo in relation to law number 13 of 1985 concerning stamp duty. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with a statutory research approach technique, from the results of research conducted the validity of decisions or decisions without stamp duty remains valid, and stamp duty on pure prodeo cannot be equated with civil evidence and fees free of charge by pure prodeo practice, this is because it is charged by the burden of costs from the state.