Abstract
AbstractJoyce Havstad has argued in this journal that the argument from inductive risk is deductively valid and sound. As far as we know, this is the best reconstruction of the argument in the literature. Unfortunately, it suffers from a small flaw that renders the argument invalid. We identify this flaw, show that it is superficial, and show that a small amendment to the argument rescues the claim of its validity.
Full Text
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Published version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have