The Validity of Hybridity in Derek Walcott’s A Branch of the Blue Nile

Abstract

With A Branch of the Blue Nile (1983) Derek Walcott makes a strong statement for the validity of a hybrid West Indian culture. He portrays the relation between European, specifically English, as well as American and African culture as one that should not be marked by a hierarchy, placing the central culture and languages at the top and African or mixed cultures/languages at the bottom. Walcott’s strategy here is to show that the so–called standards, Shakespeare’s ‘classical’ plays and their language are already of a hybrid nature, and any attempt to characterise them as homogenous entities and preserve them as such may ultimately result in their inertness. What threatens a civilisation or culture, according to Walcott, is not some form of hybridity, but rather the closing off or preservation of artistic forms from other foreign influences because it makes these artistic forms incapable of interacting with the surrounding cultural environment. The authors of this paper while appreciating all the orchestrated bonus of the existing relevant criticisms on hybridity towards Walcott’s A Branch of the Blue Nile intend to examine the use of Bakhtinian notions with regard to language exemplifying Bakhtin’s view of linguistic interanimation and his insights into the “polyglotic” and “heteroglotic” nature of the play. The purpose of this article is to provide the readers with a quest for the formation of Caribbean identity, beyond dualism, through the vernacular. Walcott portrays the vernacular as being capable of voicing the ideas necessary to define one’s identity.