Abstract
Note a propos de l'article de J. Burgess (Relevance: A Fallacy, ibid, 1981, pp. 97-104), portant sur la validite du syllogisme disjonctif. L'A. se situe dans le cadre des logiques de la pertinence et denie, contre Burgess, la validite universelle de ce type de syllogisme. P. 41-53, reponse de J. BURGESS: Common Sense and Relevance. L'A. fait preceder sa reponse a l'article de C. Mortensen d'une mise au point detaillee sur les logiques de la pertinence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
