The validity of ASMI, RASM, and L3 SMI in assessing skeletal muscle mass in patients with lung cancer.

Abstract

Both bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and electron computed tomography (CT) can be used as tools for assessing skeletal muscle mass. In order to find a more suitable method for assessing skeletal muscle mass in lung cancer patients, this study conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of the two methods. We collected baseline data from patients admitted to the oncology department of the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2017 to December 2021, and collected data through physical examination, body composition analysis measurements and CT examinations. Then we calculated skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), relative skeletal muscle index (RASM), and third lumbar spine skeletal muscle index (L3 SMI), respectively. Finally we analyzed the correlation between the three methods and body composition and biochemical indicators and the validity of the three methods. A total of 63 patients, 41 males and 22 females, were screened and eligible for enrollment, and the validity of RASM and ASMI was analyzed using L3 SMI as the diagnostic criteria: the sensitivity of RASM and ASMI were 66.67% and 13.33%, respectively, and the specificity was 70.83% and 39.58%, respectively, and the AUC of ROC was 0.736 (p<0.05), 0.264 (p<0.05). In this study, L3 SMI was used as the diagnostic criterion and after calculating and comparing the valid parameters of RASM and ASMI, RASM was recommended as the assessment criterion for skeletal muscle mass in Chinese lung cancer patients.