Abstract
Abstract Wilhelm Moses Shapira’s infamous Deuteronomy fragments have long been deemed forgeries, with Shapira himself serving as the obvious suspect. I provide new evidence that Shapira did not forge the fragments and was himself convinced of their authenticity. Indeed, the evidence for forgery is illusory. In a companion monograph, I show that the Shapira fragments are not only authentic ancient artifacts but are unprecedented in their significance: They preserve a pre-canonical antecedent of the Book of Deuteronomy.
Highlights
In this article, I offer new evidence and arguments against the prevailing theory that Wilhelm Moses Shapira forged his infamous Deuteronomy fragments.[1]I begin by providing historical background on Shapira and his manuscripts
Zeitlin wrote the following regarding the parallels between the Dead Sea Scrolls and Shapira’s manuscripts: Professor Burrows seems to have forgotten the affair of Shapira, who produced a manuscript of the Book of Deuteronomy, written on parchment in archaic Hebrew script
For more than a century, there has been a robust consensus that the Shapira manuscripts are fraudulent and that Shapira was involved in their forgery
Summary
I offer new evidence and arguments against the prevailing theory that Wilhelm Moses Shapira forged his infamous Deuteronomy fragments.[1]. I begin by providing historical background on Shapira and his manuscripts. I discuss the negative evaluation of the manuscripts in 1883, review existing objections to the arguments for forgery, and offer new objections of my own. I address more recent paleographic arguments against the authenticity of the manuscripts and show that they rest on dubious evidence and are methodologically problematic. I conclude with a summary of the outcomes of my philological analysis of the text contained in the Shapira manuscripts, which I call »The Valediction of Moses«: Far from being derivative of Deuteronomy, this text is, Deuteronomy’s ancient forebear
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.