Abstract

Background/Objectives: The necessity and clinical utility of routine pre-procedural blood tests (PBTs) before neuraxial blockade remain controversial. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PBTs in identifying clinically significant conditions in an outpatient setting. Methods: This single-center retrospective study involved patients who received neuraxial blockades from January 2020 to August 2023. We extracted medical information and laboratory data from the electronic medical records during the pre-procedural period. Through a multivariate regression analysis, we identified patient factors associated with abnormal laboratory results. Results: Advanced age (OR, 1.021; p = 0.026) and a history of cancer (OR, 2.359; p = 0.016) were significantly associated with elevated CRP levels (>0.30 mg/dL). Severe hyperglycemia (≥200 mg/dL) was found in 24 patients (3.88%), with a history of cancer being a strong predictor (OR, 6.764; p < 0.001). No significant abnormalities were observed in PT or PTT. Reduced eGFR (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) was detected in 8.62% of patients, despite no prior history of renal dysfunction. A multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age, hypertension, cancer, and coronary artery disease were significant predictors of abnormal PBT results, highlighting the importance of selective testing in high-risk patients. Conclusions: Routine PBTs are not universally required for all patients undergoing neuraxial blockade but can provide crucial information in high-risk populations. A selective testing approach based on individual risk factors is recommended to optimize patient safety and resource utilization. Future studies should aim to establish clear guidelines for targeted PBT use.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.