The utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgical treatment for spinal arteriovenous malformations: A historical control study

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study sought to investigate the utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in the surgical treatment for spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 39 patients who underwent surgical treatment for SAVMs. Twenty-eight patients who received multimodal IONM (transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials [MEPs], somatosensory-evoked potentials, continuous electromyography, and bulbocavernosus reflex [BCR]) between 2011 and 2020 were compared to 11 historical controls between 2003 and 2011. The rates of postoperative neurological deficits (PNDs), neurophysiological warnings, and their characteristics were analyzed. ResultsPNDs were developed in 10.7% and 54.5% of patients in the IONM and historical control (non-IONM) groups, respectively (p = 0.008). Moreover, not applying IONM was the only significant risk factor for the development of PNDs in the logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 10.0, p = 0.007). In the IONM group, a total of three electrophysiological warnings were observed, and two of these were true positives; one patient complained of leg motor weakness after surgery with loss of the abductor halluces MEPs. The other patient experienced disappearance of the BCR during surgery and newly developed urinary retention. Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of IONM warnings for detecting PNDs were 66.7%, 96.0%, 66.7%, and 96.0%, respectively. ConclusionsThe neurological outcome of the IONM group was significantly better than that of the historical control group in the surgical treatments for SAVMs. SignificanceMultimodal IONM could be a useful tool to detect neurological damage with relatively high accuracy in this type of surgery.