The Utility of Frozen Sections in the Evaluation of Clear Margins in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Cross-Sectional Study From a Tertiary Care Center.

Abstract

Background and objectiveHead and neck cancers are prevalent in Pakistan. Oral squamous cell carcinomas are primarily treated via surgical removal, and complete surgical resection is the paramount prognostic factor. A resection margin of 5 mm on the final histopathology report has been accepted as adequate in the existing literature. Negative margins on the frozen section do not guarantee adequate disease-free resections on the final histopathology report. In this study, we aimed to ascertain how accurately tumor-free margins can be detected on frozen sections, which are reported intraoperatively compared to permanent sections of the same tissues reported after proper staining in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan; 94 patients presenting between January and October 2016 were included in this study and a total of 432 tumor margins were assessed.ResultsAmong the total 94 patients included in the study, 79% were male and 21% were female. Buccal mucosa was the most commonly involved subsite (57%), followed by the tongue (25%). The most common T stage was T4 (33%), followed by T2 and T3 at 28% and 21% respectively, while the most common N stage was N0 (55%) followed by N1 at 16% and N2 at 22%. The sensitivity of the frozen section in comparison to the permanent section was found to be 50%, while specificity was calculated to be 99.8%. The positive predictive value was 75% and the negative predictive value was 99.3%.ConclusionThe frozen section is a highly useful tool for the evaluation of tumor margins. However, while it has high diagnostic accuracy rates, it can produce altered results and therefore requires high clinical correlation.