Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessSymposium on Explanation and Justification in Social TheoryThe Utilitarian Logic of Inalienable RightsArthur KuflikArthur Kuflik Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 97, Number 1Oct., 1986 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292818 Views: 10Total views on this site Citations: 10Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1986 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Walter E. block Conjoined Twins? Rejoinder to Wollen, Philosophia 85 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00568-yWalter E. Block Rejoinder to Huemer on Animal Rights, Studia Humana 10, no.44 (Nov 2021): 66–77.https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2021-0023W. E. Block Evictionism and Libertarianism, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39, no.33 (Apr 2014): 248–257.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhu012Hillel Steiner Directed Duties and Inalienable Rights, Ethics 123, no.22 (Jul 2015): 230–244.https://doi.org/10.1086/668708W. Block A Libertarian Perspective on the Stem Cell Debate: Compromising the Uncompromisible, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no.44 (Jul 2010): 429–448.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq033ERIC CHWANG AGAINST THE INALIENABLE RIGHT TO WITHDRAW FROM RESEARCH, Bioethics 22, no.77 (Sep 2008): 370–378.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00666.xWalter Block Alienability: rejoinder to Kuflik, Humanomics 23, no.33 (Sep 2007): 117–136.https://doi.org/10.1108/08288660710779362Walter Block Epstein on alienation: a rejoinder, International Journal of Social Economics 33, no.33 (Mar 2006): 241–260.https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610646252Charles R. Beitz The Moral Rights of Creators of Artistic and Literary Works*, Journal of Political Philosophy 13, no.33 (Sep 2005): 330–358.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00226.xYew-Kwang Ng Welfarism and Utilitarianism: A Rehabilitation, Utilitas 2, no.22 (Jan 2009): 171–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800000650

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.