Abstract

Clinical forensic medical examinations constitute an increasing proportion of our institution’s tasks, and, concomitantly, the authorities are now requesting forensic life-threatening danger assessments based on our examinations. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess if a probability of survival (PS) trauma score could be useful for these forensic life-threatening danger assessments and to identify a cut-off PS score as a supporting tool for the forensic practice of assessing life-threatening danger. We compared a forensic database and a trauma database and identified 161 individuals (aged 15 years or older) who had both a forensic life-threatening danger assessment and a PS score. The life-threatening danger assessments comprised the following statements: was not in life-threatening danger (NLD); could have been in life-threatening danger (CLD); or was in life-threatening danger (LD). The inclusion period was 2012–2016. A statistically significant difference was found in the PS scores between NLD, CLD and LD (chi-square test: p < 0.0001). The usefulness of the PS score for categorizing life-threatening danger assessments was determined by a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.84) and the ROC curve revealed that a cut-off PS score of 95.8 would appropriately identify LD. Therefore, a PS score below 95.8 would indicate life-threatening danger. We propose a further exploration of how the evidence-based PS score, including a cut-off value, might be implemented in clinical forensic medical statements to add to the scientific strength of these statements.

Highlights

  • Clinical forensic medical (CFM) examinations may include an assessment of the life-threatening danger of the documented injuries

  • We found that the probability of survival trauma scoring could be useful for forensic life-threatening danger assessments

  • Instead of identifying predictors for a multivariable model, such as in the Swedish study from 2017 [9], we have focused on the evaluations of the performance of the current forensic protocol using area under the curve (AUC)-receiver-operator characteristic (ROC), and we have identified a conservative cut-off probability of survival (PS) score that can be used as a forensic supporting tool

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinical forensic medical (CFM) examinations may include an assessment of the life-threatening danger of the documented injuries. Trauma Centre & Department of Anaesthesia, HOC, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen East 2100, Denmark approaches; a protocol regarding the assessment of life-threatening danger was implemented in 2016 at our institution, the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen. Following this protocol, our forensic specialists may come to one of the following conclusions: the examined individual (1) was not in life-threatening danger (NLD) due to stable vital parameters, sparse haemorrhage, no blood transfusion, no treatment except suturing etc.; (2) could have been in life-threatening danger (CLD) because of the necessity for treatment of the injuries; or (3) was in life-threatening danger (LD) as the injuries required emergency treatment, surgery, blood transfusion etc. Due to the nature of forensic medicine, conducting randomized clinical trials is not possible (and may not even be the proper study design) [2]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call