Abstract
BackgroundMedical journals use Twitter to engage and disseminate their research articles and implement a range of strategies to maximize reach and impact.ObjectiveThis study aims to systematically review the literature to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies used by medical journals and their effectiveness on journal impact and readership metrics.MethodsA systematic search of the literature before February 2020 in four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Articles were reviewed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines.ResultsThe search identified 44 original research studies that evaluated Twitter strategies implemented by medical journals and analyzed the relationship between Twitter metrics and alternative and citation-based metrics. The key findings suggest that promoting publications on Twitter improves citation-based and alternative metrics for academic medical journals. Moreover, implementing different Twitter strategies maximizes the amount of attention that publications and journals receive. The four key Twitter strategies implemented by many medical journals are tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. Each strategy was successful in promoting the publications. However, different metrics were used to measure success.ConclusionsFour key Twitter strategies are implemented by medical journals: tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. In this review, each strategy was successful in promoting publications but used different metrics to measure success. Thus, it is difficult to conclude which strategy is most effective. In addition, the four strategies have different costs and effects on dissemination and readership. We recommend that journals and researchers incorporate a combination of Twitter strategies to maximize research impact and capture audiences with a variety of learning methods.
Highlights
The main goals of health science research are to improve health, services, and practice, as well as develop health care technologies [1]
The purpose of this review is to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies used by medical journals and their effectiveness on article dissemination, readership, and journal impact metrics
The authors analyzed the relationship between Twitter metrics or alternative metrics and citation-based metrics for journals or articles. This is the first review to analyze the use of Twitter in medical journals and its effect on research dissemination, readership, and journal impact metrics
Summary
The main goals of health science research are to improve health, services, and practice, as well as develop health care technologies [1]. Traditional journal dissemination is passive, unplanned, and uncontrolled [1] and relies on the end user to search for information (known as the pull concept) This approach requires awareness of and access to the journal, which is not always the case for health researchers and practitioners [6]. The key findings suggest that promoting publications on Twitter improves citation-based and alternative metrics for academic medical journals. The four key Twitter strategies implemented by many medical journals are tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. Conclusions: Four key Twitter strategies are implemented by medical journals: tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. We recommend that journals and researchers incorporate a combination of Twitter strategies to maximize research impact and capture audiences with a variety of learning methods
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
