Abstract
Among phoneticians, the Vocal Profile Analysis (VPA) is one of the most widely used methods for the componential assessment of voice quality. Whether the ultimate goal of the VPA evaluation is the comparative description of languages or the characterization of an individual speaker, the VPA protocol shows great potential for different research areas of speech communication. However, its use is not without practical difficulties. Despite these, methodological studies aimed at explaining where, when and why issues arise during the perceptual assessment process are rare. In this paper we describe the methodological stages through which three analysts evaluated the voices of 99 Standard Southern British English male speakers, rated their voices using the VPA scheme, discussed inter-rater disagreements, and eventually produced an agreed version of VPA scores. These scores were then used to assess correlations between settings. We show that it is possible to reach a good degree of inter-rater agreement, provided that several calibration and training sessions are conducted. We further conclude that the perceptual assessment of voice quality using the VPA scheme is an essential tool in fields such as forensic phonetics but, foremost, that it can be adapted and modified to a range of research areas, and not necessarily limited to the evaluation of pathological voices in clinical settings.
Highlights
1.1 The perceptual assessment of voice qualityVoice quality is broadly defined as the combination of long-term, quasipermanent laryngeal and supralaryngeal parameters or settings and their associated perceptual effects
We have investigated possible correlations between different long-term vocal tract output measures – including supralaryngeal settings – with the aim of finding how VQ analysis can complement longterm formant distributions (LTFDs) and Mel frequency cepstral coefficients calculated across entire speech samples (MFCCs; French et al 2015, Hughes et al 2017)
Beck clarifies how the Vocal Profile Analysis (VPA) is intended to be used in such cases:
Summary
1.1 The perceptual assessment of voice qualityVoice quality (hereafter VQ) is broadly defined as the combination of long-term, quasipermanent laryngeal and supralaryngeal parameters or settings and their associated perceptual effects. Many authors have adopted this broad sense of voice quality, which draws on the view that each of the organs of the vocal apparatus has a bearing on a speaker’s VQ (e.g. Laver 1980, Klatt & Klatt 1990, Beck 2005). C International Phonetic Association First published online 29 June 2018 Kreiman & Sidtis (2011: 9) summarize VQ as ‘an interaction between a listener and a signal’
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.