Abstract

To fulfill existing guidelines, applicants that aim to place their genetically modified (GM) insect-resistant crop plants on the market are required to provide data from field experiments that address the potential impacts of the GM plants on nontarget organisms (NTO's). Such data may be based on varied experimental designs. The recent EFSA guidance document for environmental risk assessment (2010) does not provide clear and structured suggestions that address the statistics of field trials on effects on NTO's. This review examines existing practices in GM plant field testing such as the way of randomization, replication, and pseudoreplication. Emphasis is placed on the importance of design features used for the field trials in which effects on NTO's are assessed. The importance of statistical power and the positive and negative aspects of various statistical models are discussed. Equivalence and difference testing are compared, and the importance of checking the distribution of experimental data is stressed to decide on the selection of the proper statistical model. While for continuous data (e.g., pH and temperature) classical statistical approaches – for example, analysis of variance (ANOVA) – are appropriate, for discontinuous data (counts) only generalized linear models (GLM) are shown to be efficient. There is no golden rule as to which statistical test is the most appropriate for any experimental situation. In particular, in experiments in which block designs are used and covariates play a role GLMs should be used. Generic advice is offered that will help in both the setting up of field testing and the interpretation and data analysis of the data obtained in this testing. The combination of decision trees and a checklist for field trials, which are provided, will help in the interpretation of the statistical analyses of field trials and to assess whether such analyses were correctly applied.We offer generic advice to risk assessors and applicants that will help in both the setting up of field testing and the interpretation and data analysis of the data obtained in field testing.

Highlights

  • In field experiments on plant effects on the soil habitat, for instance with genetically modified (GM) plants, five components need consideration

  • We examine the statistical approaches used in current studies on the effects of GM plants on NTOs in the field, mainly focusing on arthropods and other invertebrates

  • This review summarizes the most important statistical considerations with respect to the field testing of GM crop plants in relation to their potential effects on NTOs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In field experiments on plant effects on the soil habitat, for instance with genetically modified (GM) plants, five components need consideration. A properly designed experiment must follow three rules/ principles: (1) are randomly allocated to experimental units to neutralize the effects of location (or other uncontrolled factors, e.g., weather effects); (2) are sufficiently replicated to allow an adequate estimation of experimental error variance; (3) experimental units are (e.g., often, different fields or plots) grouped into homogeneous blocks prior to application of the treatment in order to minimize the impact of other controllable factors, such as differences in soil composition (Schabenberger and Pierce 2002). Nowadays the number of replicates can be calculated by using any of many statistical packages that are able to estimate the required sample size under different experimental designs, taking into account the effect size, the variance, the degrees of freedom, and other factors (see the Power analysis described below). Each unit is assumed to have been treated independently of the other units in the same treatment (Hurlbert 1984)

Type of null hypothesis
Discussion
Findings
Conflict of Interest
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.