The use of soil nutrient balances in deriving forest biomass harvesting guidelines specific to region, tree species and soil type in the Netherlands

Wim De Vries,Anjo De Jong,Johannes Kros,Joop Spijker

doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118591

Wim De Vries, Anjo De Jong + Show 2 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118591

Copy DOI

Abstract

The substitution of biomass for fossil fuels in energy consumption is a measure to decrease the emissions of greenhouse gases and thereby mitigate global warming. During recent years, this has led to an increasing interest to use tree harvest residues as feedstock for bioenergy. An important concern related to the removal of harvesting residues is, however, the potential adverse effects on soil fertility caused by increased nutrient removal, relative to conventional stem-only harvesting. In the Netherlands this is a major concern, since most forests are located on poor sandy soils.To develop forest harvesting guidelines, we applied a mass balance approach comparing nutrient inputs by deposition and weathering with nutrient outputs by harvesting and leaching for various timber harvesting scenarios, including both stem-only harvesting and additional removal of tree tops and branches. A distinction was made in seven major tree species, six soil types (three sandy soils, loam, clay and peat soils) and nine regions, with clear variations in atmospheric deposition of phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and potassium (K). For each region-tree-soil combination we calculated the maximum amounts that can be harvested such that the output of the nutrients Ca, Mg, K and P is balanced with the inputs. Results showed that at current harvesting rates, a negative balance of Ca, Mg, K or P is hardly calculated for the richer loamy to clayey soil types, while depletion can occur for the poorer sandy soils, particularly of P and K. Results are used to derive forest biomass harvesting guidelines, taking the uncertainties in the mass balance approach into account. The role of mitigating management approaches is also discussed.

Highlights

Forests are expected to be used more intensively in the decades, with growing demands for timber and for use of biomass as a source of renewable energy (Mantau et al, 2010; Nabuurs et al, 2015)
We present a quantitative nutrient balance approach, comparing inputs and outputs for different combinations of tree species, soil types and regions in the Netherlands, being the basis of forest biomass harvesting guidelines in view of sustainable nutrient use
Results of the nutrient balance calculations show that soils below beech and oak are most sensitive to loss of Ca, K and P stocks, even under stem only harvesting (SOH), except for Ca and K at low growth levels

Summary

Introduction

Forests are expected to be used more intensively in the decades, with growing demands for timber and for use of biomass as a source of renewable energy (Mantau et al, 2010; Nabuurs et al, 2015). While current forest biomass harvesting levels in Europe and the Netherlands are below annual increment (Schelhaas et al, 2014), a growing market for wood materials and biofuels will put increasing pressure on resource provisioning from forests (Mantau et al, 2010; Nabuurs et al, 2015). Whole tree harvesting is increasingly applied in Europe as the marketability of the woody residues has increased This trend is in line with the policy of the EU and of the Netherlands to reach a complete circular economy by 2050. By harvesting the entire above-ground part of the tree, the biomass removed by harvest can be 30% larger than compared to conventional stem-only harvesting (Pels, 2011, Aherne et al, 2012)

Methods

Discussion

Conclusion