Abstract

Rubber dam is considered an ideal device for tooth isolation. Nevertheless, its usage is quite rare in the Czech Republic. The aim of this study was: firstly, to gather and evaluate information regarding the use of rubber dam by dentists in the Czech Republic and to compare it with other countries; secondly to find out whether there are any influencing factors as to rubber dam usage; and finally to find out frequency of rubber dam use separately in endodontic treatment and in placing fillings of different materials. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted. Dentists filled in the questionnaires during dental conventions, educational events, conferences and congresses. Rubber dam was routinely used by less than eight per cent of the respondents (n = 35); less than twenty-two per cent of the respondents (n = 97) used rubber dam occasionally, and more than seventy per cent of the respondents (n = 317) has never use it. The results showed that rubber dam is not used frequently in the Czech Republic. If rubber dam is used, then it is typically for endodontic treatment or composite fillings. There were several factors with a statistically significant influence on the usage of rubber dam, such as gender, length of professional career, percentage of direct payments, previous experience in using rubber dam, and undergraduate training in rubber dam use.

Highlights

  • Rubber dam is considered an ideal device for tooth isolation in restorative dentistry and endodontics

  • No similar study about rubber dam usage has been performed in the Czech Republic yet

  • The aim of this study was firstly to gather and evaluate information regarding the use of rubber dam by dentists in the Czech Republic and to compare it with other countries, secondly to find out whether there are any influencing factors as to rubber dam usage, and to find out frequency of rubber dam use separately in endodontic treatment and in placing fillings of different materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rubber dam is considered an ideal device for tooth isolation in restorative dentistry and endodontics. In spite of all the recommendations (6) and its wide range of functions, rubber dam has been often overlooked by general dental practitioners (1, 4, 8). Many studies have been published dealing with the frequency of rubber dam usage within several countries. The declared portion of rubber dam users varies greatly, ranging from 3% to 90% (2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 21, 22). The portion of rubber dam non-users is from 44.5% to 95% (9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22). No similar study about rubber dam usage has been performed in the Czech Republic yet

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call