The Use of Quality Improvement Interventions in Reducing Rarely Appropriate Cardiac Imaging

Abstract

The use of cardiac imaging has become increasingly prevalent over the last decade. Approximately 10% to 15% of noninvasive cardiac imaging is ordered for rarely appropriate indications. The appropriate use criteria (AUC) for cardiac imaging were issued to decrease unnecessary testing and reduce health care costs. However, it remains unclear whether these efforts have been successful. This meta-analysis evaluates whether AUC quality improvement (QI) interventions effectively reduce inappropriate cardiac imaging. Databases were searched for studies reporting QI intervention effect aiming to reduce rarely appropriate noninvasive cardiac imaging based on AUC. Imaging modalities assessed include transthoracic echocardiography, stress echocardiography, and myocardial perfusion imaging. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL. The primary end point was a decrease of rarely appropriate testing. The search was not restricted to time or publication status. The literature search identified 2,391 possible studies, 13 studies and 26,557 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 12months (1 to 60months). QI interventions were statistically significant in reducing rarely appropriate tests after the intervention compared with the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.64, p <0.01). The QI interventions were also assessed for persistence based on short-term (<3months) and long-term (>3months) efficacy. Both the short-term effect and long-term effect were persistent (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.77, p <0.01 and OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.61, p <0.01, respectively). AUC QI interventions are associated with the successful decrease of inappropriate noninvasive cardiac testing with these effects persisting over time.