Abstract
Organic fertilizer applications can contribute to Zinc (Zn) biofortification of crops. An enriched stable isotope source tracing approach is a central tool to further determine the potential of this biofortification measure. Here, we assessed the use of the widely available quadrupole single-collector ICPMS (Q-ICPMS, analytical error = 1% relative standard deviation) and the less accessible but more precise multicollector ICPMS as reference instrument (MC-ICPMS, analytical error = 0.01% relative standard deviation) to measure enriched Zn stable isotope ratios in soil–fertilizer–plant systems. The isotope label was either applied to the fertilizer (direct method) or to the soil available Zn pool that was determined by isotope ratios measurements of the shoots that grew on labeled soils without fertilizer addition (indirect method). The latter approach is used to trace Zn that was added to soils with complex insoluble organic fertilizers that are difficult to label homogeneously. To reduce isobaric interferences during Zn isotope measurements, ion exchange chromatography was used to separate the Zn from the sample matrix. The 67Zn:66Zn isotope ratios altered from 0.148 at natural abundance to 1.561 in the fertilizer of the direct method and 0.218 to 0.305 in soil available Zn of the indirect method. Analysis of the difference (Bland–Altman) between the two analytical instruments revealed that the variation between 67Zn:66Zn isotope ratios measured with Q-ICPMS and MC-ICPMS were on average 0.08% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68%]. The fractions of Zn derived from the fertilizer in the plant were on average 0.16% higher (CI = 0.49%) when analyzed with Q- compared to MC-ICPMS. The sample matrix had a larger impact on isotope measurements than the choice of analytical instrument, as non-purified samples resulted on average 5.79% (CI = 9.47%) higher isotope ratios than purified samples. Furthermore, the gain in analytical precision using MC-ICPMS instead of Q-ICPMS was small compared to the experimental precision. Thus, Zn isotope measurements of purified samples measured with Q-ICPMS is a valid method to trace Zn sources in soil–fertilizer–plant systems. For the indirect source tracing approach, we outlined strategies to sufficiently enrich the soil with Zn isotopes without significantly altering the soil available Zn pool.
Highlights
Low Zn concentrations in edible plant parts can lead to Zn deficiency in humans especially in areas with cereal based diets (Black et al, 2008, Wessells and Brown, 2012)
We considered three different types of precision: i) the analytical precision, which originated from repeat measurements of a single sample, ii) precision resulting from measurements of processing replicates which originated from the same sample that was processed several times, and iii) experimental precision which originated from treatment replicates that consisted of n = 4 independent replicates
Our study suggests that quadrupole ICP-MS equipped with a collision cell (Q-ICPMS) is adequate to trace Zn isotopes in studies on plant Zn sourcing with a limited number of treatment and sample replicates
Summary
Low Zn concentrations in edible plant parts can lead to Zn deficiency in humans especially in areas with cereal based diets (Black et al, 2008, Wessells and Brown, 2012). Soluble Zn (e.g. ZnCl2) is added to the soil to label the plant available Zn fraction of the soil and the subsequent addition of an unlabeled fertilizer to the soil leads to an isotope dilution of the plant available Zn fraction. For both source tracing techniques, three conditions need to be fulfilled: i) the introduced spike should not alter the availability of Zn from the labeled source, ii) the isotope used for labeling do not differ in their behavior in the system, iii) and the isotopic label should be homogeneously mixed in the source to be traced (Cobelli et al, 2000; Hamon et al, 2008). It was successfully used to determine the effects of complex insoluble fertilizers on N and P nutrition of crops (Douxchamps et al, 2011; Nanzer et al, 2014) and to measure Zn uptake from Zn oxide (McBeath and McLaughlin, 2014)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
