Abstract
Infection is of primary concern to those practitioners treating burns patients, as it is one of the primary complications associated with acute wounds and particularly with superficial partial-thickness burns. In the fight to reduce the risks, many practitioners deploy common antimicrobials agents prophylactically to help reduce risks, e.g. povidone-iodine. This review will examine the evidence to support this practice. The deployment of povidone-iodine in wound care is highly controversial, with questions being raised concerning not only the effectiveness of the product but also its safety and effect on wound healing. The use of povidone-iodine has been investigated both in vitro and in vivo, resulting in conflicting and often contradictory results. Of the work completed to date, researchers have failed to identify or control for extraneous variables which makes it difficult to compare and interpret research findings. The potential benefits or harm that the use of povidone-iodine may elicit in acute wounds is yet to be established.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
