Abstract

SummarySerious environmental impacts of acidic drainage from acid sulphate soils in coastal areas are the result of the interactions between the hydrologic cycle, land use and drainage management, and pore water chemistry. In this study, in situ, diffusion‐controlled dialysis profile samplers, or peepers, were used to examine pore water chemistry of acid sulphate soils in a coastal, sugarcane‐producing area in Eastern Australia. The peepers sampled pore water at 20‐mm intervals over a 1.0‐m length, permitting excellent resolution of the sharp transitions in pore water chemistry that occur around a soil profile’s iron sulphide oxidation front. Comparison of peeper profiles with soil water profiles extracted from soil samples by centrifuging, illustrated the advantages of peepers over conventional soil water sampling techniques in unconsolidated, sulphidic soils. For conventional sampling, the low permeability, gel‐like, unoxidized soil samples had to be frozen then thawed before water could be extracted by centrifuging. Peeper profiles of species not involved in redox reactions agreed well with those from centrifuged soil extracts. Redox sensitive species, however, were in poorer agreement because of the lengthy soil sample preparation and extraction procedures required for extraction by centrifuging. The approximately 6‐day equilibration time required for peeper sampling allows them to follow monthly or seasonal changes in pore water chemistry in acid sulphate soils due to variations in climate, and land use and management.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call