The Use of Pedometers in Stroke Survivors: Are They Feasible and How Well Do They Detect Steps?

Abstract

Carroll SL, Greig CA, Lewis SJ, McMurdo ME, Sniehotta FF, Johnston M, Johnston DW, Scopes J, Mead GE. The use of pedometers in stroke survivors: are they feasible and how well do they detect steps? ObjectivesTo determine (1) the feasibility of pedometers for stroke patients and (2) the level of agreement between pedometers and actual step count. DesignObservational agreement study. SettingSix stroke units. ParticipantsIndependently mobile stroke patients (N=50) ready for hospital discharge. InterventionsPatients were asked to apply 3 pedometers: 1 around the neck and 1 above each hip. Patients performed a short walk lasting 20 seconds, then a 6-minute walk test 6MWT. Video recordings determined the criterion standard step count. Main Outcome MeasureAgreement between the step count recorded by pedometers and the step count recorded by viewing the criterion standard video recordings of the 2 walks. ResultsFive patients (10%) needed assistance to put on the pedometers, and 5 (10%) could not read the step count. Thirty-nine (78%) would use pedometers again. Below a gait speed of about 0.5m/s, pedometers did not generally detect steps. Agreement analyses showed that even above 0.5m/s, pedometers undercounted steps for both the short walk and 6MWT; for example, the mean difference between the video recorder and pedometer around the neck was 5.93 steps during the short walk and 32.4 steps during the 6MWT. ConclusionsPedometers are feasible but generally do not detect steps at gait speeds below about 0.5m/s, and they undercount steps at gait speeds above 0.5m/s.