Abstract

Parametric statistical methods assume samples that have a normal distribution and representative sample sizes (i.e. n >20). Quantitative electron microscopy is inherently restricted to small sample sizes and a priori there is no way to know if the expression of the ligand being studied has a normal distribution. Thus to make statistical inferences based on data generated by quantitative electron microscopy using parametric methods may not be justified. Nonparametric statistical methods offer a tool for the evaluation of data that do not meet the criteria for analysis by parametric methods. In this report I show the utility of using nonparametric statistical methods for the analysis of data generated by quantitative electron microscopy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call