Abstract

In empirical research significant diversity of corporate cash holdings speed of adjustment (SOA) estimates can be observed. It is possible that some of the results are affected by publication selection bias. Articles whose results are clearly in line with economic theories may be preferred by authors and reviewers and, consequently, conclusions from this area can be published more frequently. The aim of this article is to verify whether there is a publication selection bias with respect to studies related to corporate cash holdings adjustments and to investigate the sources of heterogeneity in cash holdings SOA estimates. The statistical method used in the study was meta-analysis, which allows a combined analysis of the results from independent research. Meta-analysis enables to verify the occurrence of the publication selection bias and to explain the heterogeneity of the results presented in articles. The study was based on data collected asa result of a review of the literature published between 2003 and 2017. On the basis of information on 402 estimates from 58 different studies it has been shown that the publication selection bias does not occur. The Bayesian Model Averaging was used for modelling. It was identified that the characteristics associated with the data set used in the study, model specification and the estimation method significantly affect the hetero-geneity of corporate cash holdings SOA estimates. This diversity is determined, among others, by the choice of estimation method, length of the period covered by the analysis and characteristics of the market environment of the concerned entities.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call