Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the position of the government in government cooperation agreements with business entities and how Alternative Dispute Resolution in KBBU. With normative juridical method, this study found that there is no clear legal basis related to the regulation of the government as a legal entity because Article 1653 of the Civil Code states the recognition of an association as a legal entity is mandatory through legislation; the position of the government is not explained in the general provisions of the PPP Presidential Regulation, but implicitly what the government means in PPP Presidential Regulation is ministries, institutions, and regions represented by Ministers, Heads of institutions and regional heads. Determination of Ministers/Heads of institutions/heads of Regions / BUMN and BUMD as PJPK based on authority in sectoral legislation; and the basis of binding balance in the position of the government as a party to the PPP agreement. So if there is a dispute in the PPP then naturally there is an alternative dispute resolution offered by using mediation as an alternative dispute resolution option.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
