Abstract

With the rise of bilingual and multilingual approaches to teaching a second/foreign language, an overwhelming majority of second language acquisition (SLA) researchers have emphasized the important role of the use of mother tongue (L1) in a second language (L2) class and have argued that the use of L2 positively contributes to the cognitive development of students. However, what aspect of L1 should be used in an L2 class have not been specified explicitly. This study set out to investigate the extent to which teachers believe in the efficacy of the use of L1 metalanguage and the extent to which they use it in their classes in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context of Qatar. The second aim was to assess students’ beliefs regarding the extent to which the use of L1 metalanguage in an L2 class facilitated their learning process. Most importantly, the study aimed to investigate whether there was a discrepancy between students’ expectations and teachers’ agendas regarding the use of L1 metalanguage in L2 classrooms. The hypothesis that underpinned this study was that the use of L1 metalanguage to explain structural concepts in L2 contributed to crosslinguistic and metalinguistic awareness. The study adopted a qualitative approach; two questionnaires were developed, one for students and one for teachers. The questionnaire consisted of 5-point Likert scale statements and questions. Twenty-six undergraduate students and eight teachers participated in the study. The students’ proficiency level in English was elementary. The teachers were recruited on the basis of their native Arabic language proficiency. The findings suggested that both teachers and students viewed the use of Arabic in their English classes positively, and that no substantial discrepancy was observed between the students and the teachers over the issue of the use of Arabic in class. A minor discrepancy was that whereas the teachers were inclined to use Arabic slightly more for the teaching of grammar than the teaching of vocabulary, the students believed that the use of Arabic for learning vocabulary was more beneficial to their learning than it was for learning grammar.

Highlights

  • 1 The use of L1 in L2 classes continues to be a controversial issue in second language acquisition (SLA) research

  • This study argues that the use of L1 metalanguage to explain structural concepts in L2 contributes to crosslinguistic and metalinguistic awareness

  • The study aims to explore whether the use of L1 metalanguage in an L2 class could be beneficial to both teachers and students

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study argues that the use of L1 metalanguage to explain structural concepts in L2 contributes to crosslinguistic and metalinguistic awareness. The study aims to explore whether the use of L1 metalanguage in an L2 class could be beneficial to both teachers and students. In this sense, the study limits L1 use in L2 classes to the use of L1 metalanguage where teachers can make crosslinguistic references. Teachers can use L1 metalanguage for the teaching of grammar, and for teaching vocabulary, phonology, and other formal properties of language such as syntax and morphology

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call