Abstract
This article reports on a study into how the Queensland Law Reform Commission (‘QLRC’) cites journalarticles. It found that journal articles had a limited presence within QLRC reports, suggesting that QLRC doesnot engage significantly with academic literature in its approach to law reform. This raises issues both for lawreform and the Australian legal academy. For law reform there is the issue of whether the QLRC shouldengage more deeply with material from journal articles. For the Australian legal academy there is the issue ofwhether it should be researching and writing about matters of importance to reforming Australian law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
