The use of invasive techniques, angiography and indicator dilution, for quantification of valvular regurgitations.

Abstract

Angiographic techniques have been used for the quantification of mitral or aortic and rarely tricuspid regurgitation. Mitral or aortic regurgitant volume per beat and the regurgitation fraction (fao and fm, respectively) are obtained from the angiographic determination of total left ventricular stroke volume (TSV) and forward stroke volume (FSV) estimated by a different technique. Although this procedure is generally accepted as the gold standard for quantification of left heart regurgitations, there are several limitations: In the presence of mitral and aortic regurgitation no separate quantification of fao and fm is feasible; heart rate at the time of determination of FSV (from Fick or dye dilution cardiac output) and of TSV (angio) may be different; there is a tendency to consistently overestimate stroke volume by angio techniques; repeated estimations of TSV by angio are influenced by the circulatory effects of the contrast dye. In contrast indicator dilution techniques, where upstream and downstream sampling allow the simultaneous estimation of forward and regurgitant flow, the accuracy of the determination of FSV is well established and repeated estimations of fao and fm are possible because the indicators do not have cardiovascular effects. These methods are, however, crucially dependent on thorough mixing of the regurgitant volume with the blood in the upstream chamber. In 23 patients with isolated aortic regurgitation there was a positive correlation between fao evaluated by thermodilution and fao determined by the biplane angio-Fick method (r = 0.59). fao by thermodilution averaged 0.40 and fao by angio-Fick 0.46 (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)