Abstract

A frequent problem in designing a clinical trial is the need to rely on guesses of the magnitude of parameters, such as means and variances, needed to perform the calculations of required sample size. A sample size adjustment design incorporates a protocol-specified interim analysis conducted not to test a hypothesis but rather to adjust the sample size of the trial. This paper extends previous work on internal pilot studies for normally distributed outcome variables to the case of a binomial outcome variable.Through a specific example from a cancer clinical trial, the effect of the sample size adjustment process on significance level, power, and average sample size is addressed. Design issues such as timing of the interim analysis, potential for unblinding, and the effect of disparity of initial guesses of parameter values and estimates derived from interim analysis are also discussed. The sample size adjustment process is found to have negligible effect on significance level and to deliver reasonable po...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.