Abstract

Homework assignments have evolved into a highly important feature of psychotherapy research and practice. In essence, homework allows the practitioner to make use of the time between sessions by engaging the client in activities that are targeted toward therapy goals. While originating in behavioral and cognitive therapies (e.g., Herzberg, 1941; Kelly, 1955), the broader implications of acquiring new knowledge and skills through the completion of homework are becoming progressively more apparent. In fact, learning through the completion of homework assignments has recently been described as “a common process” to both cognitive and dynamic therapies (Badgio, Halperin, & Barber, 1999). Two decades of research have supported the assertion that psychotherapy involving homework yields a greater treatment effect size than psychotherapy without homework (Kazantzis, Deane, & Ronan, 2000). It is also clear that compliance with homework assignments, as rated by different sources, and as measured in different ways, is a consistently significant predictor of treatment outcome. Furthermore, a recent practitioner survey demonstrated that 98% of practicing psychologists use homework in their clinical practice (Kazantzis & Deane, 1999). There is also increasing evidence to suggest that psychotherapy outcomes are predicted by practitioner competency in the administration of homework (e.g., Shaw et al., 1999). Despite the increasing attention directed toward homework in psychotherapy, surprisingly little has been published about the process by which homework is integrated into therapy. This is the focus of the current issue of In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice. The way in which the homework is designed with the client is as important as the

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call