Abstract

Improving safety has always been the top interest in the aviation industry. The outcomes of safety and risk analyses have become much more thorough and sophisticated. They have become an industry standard of safety investigations in many airlines nowadays. In the past, airlines were much more limited in answering the questions about hazardous situations, accident probabilities, and accident rates. Airlines try hard to cope with stricter safety standards. The objective of this paper is to find out and quantify the extent of the expert judgment in helping airlines in the evaluation of the Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) events. On top of that, the paper reveals the method for a careful choice of experts, so that their estimations will maximize the potential of an accurate and useful outcome. Also, the paper provides details of implementation of the classical model into this research, then continues with the calculations and visualization of the outcomes. The outcomes are probability distributions per each aircraft type, then per IATA accident type and finally per FDM event.

Highlights

  • Expert judgments have been used during recent decades to gather many expert opinions about different subjects

  • Numerous human error assessment techniques are available for human reliability derivation, they have not been applied in flight safety assessment [8]

  • The Y axis is the number of accidents that can occur in 10,000 occurrences of a particular Flight Data Monitoring (FDM) event

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Expert judgments have been used during recent decades to gather many expert opinions about different subjects. They have earned an increased attention in risk assessment across various industries. Seeking experts’ opinion has played a vital role in maritime, nuclear, aerospace, chemical, economical, meteorological, and technical industries to provide estimations on the desired subjects of interest [1][3]. These include, inter alia, risk assessments and their influence on safety in the area of interest [4]. The risk assessment and mitigation process were presented through steps logically excluded from the multi-stage process [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.