Abstract

Objective — to optimize the results of endovascular treatment of stenotic pathology of brachiocephalic arteries.
 Materials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 112 patients, among whom there were 79 (70.5 %) men and 33 (29.5 %) women aged from 28 to 86 years with symptomatic stenotic lesions of brachiocephalic arteries treated in the neurosurgical department of the Zaporizhzhia regional hospital in the period from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed. Observations were divided into three groups depending on the localization of the defeat: internal carotid artery — 74 (66 %) cases (predominant stenosis of the mouth of the ICA (n = 71)), vertebral artery — 25 (22.4 %), a portion of the subclavian artery or brachiocephalic trunk — 13 (11.6 %). All patients underwent MRI of the brain in the preoperative period, as well as in 45 (40 %) cases of CTangiography. In all cases prior to surgery invasive angiography was performed with an assessment of the state and anatomy of the brachiocephalic and intracranial arteries, as well as the possibilities of collateral blood flow.
 Results. In the first group, which was conducted carotid stenting embolic protection device was used in 72 (97.2 %) cases. In the second group, distal protection device were used twice 2 (8 %) in the resolution of extended stenoses of the dominant vertebral artery mouth. In the third group, the distal protection device was used in 1 (7.7 %) case for stenting the critical extended stenosis of the brachiocephalic trunk with the transition to common carotid artery. Complications were noted in 9 observations. In one case there was a development of ischemic stroke, intraoperatively, in a patient with an echeloned lesion of the intracranial basin of a stenting internal carotid artery, probably against a background of hypotension of the stent developed during implantation. In 8 (7.1 %) cases the formation of the hematoma of the puncture site of the femoral artery was noted.
 Conclusions. The use of embolic protection device is mandatory in standard carotid stenting. The choice of method of protection depends on the severity of stenosis, as well as the individual features of collateral blood flow. When stenting subclavian artery, brachiocephalic trunk and vertebral artery, in some cases it is justified to use distal protection devices, the latter increases the safety of the operation.

Highlights

  • Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy / W.D

  • Brachiocephalic trunk and vertebral artery, in some cases it is justified to use distal protection devices, the latter increases the safety of the operation

Read more

Summary

Executive summary

Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2014 update: A report from the American Heart Association. / Go A.S., Mozaffrian D., Roger V.L. [et al.] // Circulation. — 2014. — N 3 (129).— P. 399–410. Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2014 update: A report from the American Heart Association. / Go A.S., Mozaffrian D., Roger V.L. 8. Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy / W.D. Jordan Jr, D.C. Voellinger, D.D. Doblar [et al.] // Cardiovasc. 9. Percutaneous endovascular treatment of innominate artery lesions: a single-centre experience on 77 lesions / T.M. Paukovits, L. Schneider P.A. How do I select cerebral protection devices today? / P.A. Schneider, G.J. Ansel // Cardiovasc.

Materials and methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call