Abstract
Glasgow et al reported a cost-utility analysis (CUA) of prophylactic dextrose gel compared with standard care for neonatal hypoglycemia in at-risk infants.1 They found that this simple intervention not only reduced long-term morbidity and mortality, but also saved money. Their analysis is based on a decision tree model, evaluated over a time horizon of 18 years.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
