Abstract

The role of ecological science in promoting sound environmental decisions has concerned ecologists worldwide and it has been stressed that the application of ecological knowledge requires new interactive and participatory forms of research, as well as sound partnerships between ecologists and land managers. However, concrete examples of ecological science as part of rural decision making have rarely been examined, especially in intertropical countries. We analyzed interactions between ecological scientists from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and a rural indigenous community involved in forest management in Central‐Western Mexico. Using qualitative research methods (such as observing participants, conducting interviews; generally focusing on the meanings that social actors give to phenomena), we compared the perspectives of the academic and community sectors in relation to benefits, products, problems, and obstacles faced when conducting integrative forest management. The research showed the relevance of rural communities demanding scientific information for ecosystem management and of academic institutions accepting to respond to these demands. Participatory approaches and continuous communication between sectors were essential for establishing trust and commitment for everyone involved. The obstacles found were related to an academic institution's inability to support such an experience and to accept capacity building of rural managers as part of its scientific mission. We concluded that applied ecological science in developing countries, such as Mexico, should regard rural communities as key ecosystem managers and should respond to their needs and demands in order to convert pure scientific findings into wise environmental decisions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call