Abstract
In the unfolding reality of advanced internet-based communication tools, the possibilities and implications for citizens’ e-engagement is revealing. The paper introduces different examples of e-tools used in participatory urban green infrastructure governance. E-tools here includes various location-based service apps, and volunteered geographic information stemming from social media activities, as well as public participation geographic information system approaches. Through an analytical framework describing five categories, we discuss the different scopes and possibilities, as well as general barriers and problems to participatory e-tools. We suggest some basic premises for the application of e-tools in urban green infrastructure governance and discussed future development of this field. E-tools can allow interaction between citizens, public authorities, and other stakeholders; however, research on the implications of such location-based governance is needed to make full use of the rapid on-going development of such information and communication technologies, and to avoid possible pitfalls. We suggest that future research into this area of environmental–social–technical solutions should test, discuss, and develop frameworks and standards, for the use of different e-tools in combination with offline approaches.
Highlights
Digital tools, or e-tools as we call them here, are increasingly being used in urban green infrastructure (UGI) planning and governance
When citizens have a greater say about their local environments in planning and policy-making, this can eventually lead to citizen stewardship, which is important both for the quality of urban green infrastructure (UGI) and for human well-being [3,4,5]
We suggest that several aspects of using e-tools are relevant for participatory UGI governance, whilst we highlight effects that can be counterproductive
Summary
E-tools as we call them here, are increasingly being used in urban green infrastructure (UGI) planning and governance. When citizens have a greater say about their local environments in planning and policy-making, this can eventually lead to citizen stewardship, which is important both for the quality of urban green infrastructure (UGI) and for human well-being [3,4,5]. This short communication presents critical understandings of the role of e-tools in UGI governance and what this trend holds in positive and negative aspects. We suggest that several aspects of using e-tools are relevant for participatory UGI governance, whilst we highlight effects that can be counterproductive
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.